Parallel.For Method in .NET 4.0 vs the C# For Loop

Posted by: Suprotim Agarwal , on 11/17/2010, in Category .NET Framework
Views: 120765
Abstract: In this article, we will explore the static method Parallel.For. A lot of developers ask me about the difference between the C# for loop statement and the Parallel.For. We will see the difference with an example

A couple of months ago, I had written some articles on the Parallel class found in the System.Threading.Tasks namespace which provides library-based data parallel replacements for common operations such as for loops, for each loops, and execution of a set of statements. You can read the articles here

Parallel Tasks in .NET 4.0

Parallel Tasks – Methods that Return value

Cancelling Tasks in .NET 4.0

In this article, we will explore the static method Parallel.For. A lot of developers ask me about the difference between the C# for loop statement and the Parallel.For. The difference is that with the C# for statement, the loop is run from a single thread. However the Parallel class uses multiple threads. Moreover the order of the iteration in the parallel version is not necessarily in order.

Let us see an example:

using System;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
 
namespace ParallelFor
{
class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Using C# For Loop \n");
 
        for(int i=0; i <=10; i++){
            Console.WriteLine("i = {0}, thread = {1}",
                i, Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
            Thread.Sleep(10);
        }
 
        Console.WriteLine("\nUsing Parallel.For \n");
 
        Parallel.For(0, 10, i =>
        {
            Console.WriteLine("i = {0}, thread = {1}", i,
            Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId);
            Thread.Sleep(10);
        });
           
        Console.ReadLine();
    }
}

}


As you can see, the Parallel.For method is defined as Parallel.For Method (Int32, Int32, Action(Of Int32)). Here the first param is the start index (inclusive), the second param is the end index (exclusive) and the third param is the Action<int> delegate that is invoked once per iteration. Here’s the output of running the code:

Parallel.For Loop 

As you can see, with the C# for loop statement, the results are printed sequentially and the loop is run from a single thread. However with the Parallel.For method uses multiple threads and the order of the iteration is not in order.

The Parallel.For() construct is useful if you have a set of data that is to be processed independently. The construct splits the task over multiple processor.

The entire source code of this article can be downloaded over here

Give a +1 to this article if you think it was well written. Thanks!
Recommended Articles
Suprotim Agarwal, ASP.NET Architecture MVP, MCSD, MCAD, MCDBA, MCSE, is the CEO of A2Z Knowledge Visuals Pvt. He primarily works as an Architect Consultant and provides consultancy on how to design and develop .NET centric database solutions.

Suprotim is the founder and primary contributor to DotNetCurry, DNC .NET Magazine, SQLServerCurry and DevCurry. He has also written an EBook 51 Recipes using jQuery with ASP.NET Controls. and is authoring another one at The Absolutely Awesome jQuery CookBook.

Follow him on twitter @suprotimagarwal


Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


User Feedback
Comment posted by Ehsan on Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:33 PM
Nicely explained.
Comment posted by Gigimoi on Sunday, March 18, 2012 1:39 AM
No performance testing?
Comment posted by Diego on Friday, July 27, 2012 1:47 PM
I had done a little and simple performance testing and was found that the Parallel.For is better than classic for loop and is faster 50 more or less in a quad core environment%
Comment posted by Piotr on Sunday, May 26, 2013 5:36 PM
Pity that the example is quite impractical. Perhaps, you would like to expand the topic in the future. The use can be understood by the name "parallel for" by itself, but the trick is when to use it. Sorry for being so critical.
Comment posted by Captain on Friday, August 2, 2013 1:40 AM
If we use the stopwatch and measure the excution time then Parallel For loop and Parallel ForEach loops are faster.
Please have look at tese links. The time execution time is measured in both the for and parallel for loop. You will come to know the difference instantly.

http://www.dotnetlines.com/Blogs/tabid/85/EntryId/28/Parallel-For-loop-in-Net-4-0.aspx

http://www.dotnetlines.com/Blogs/tabid/85/EntryId/29/Parallel-ForEach-loop-in-Net-4-0.aspx

Post your comment
Name:  
E-mail: (Will not be displayed)
Comment:
Insert Cancel